Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1601
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Dubey, Pankaj | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-10-28T05:50:23Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-10-28T05:50:23Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019-05 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1601 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Conformational preferences of α-amino acids were studied using matrix isolation infrared and ab initio computations. As a result of this study, the factors that determine the conformational stability of amino acids were recognized. It turns out that the low energy conformers of α-amino acids prefer predominantly two types of backbone structures (i.e. the relative orientation of COOH and NH 2 moiety) and these two preferred orientations were labelled as “type I or II”. An analysis of the conformer population indicates that ~80 % of the amino acid populations take up backbone type I and II structures. For these backbone structures, the various orientations of the side chain in the amino acids gave rise to a variety of conformers for each amino acid. The question was then addressed to see if these preferred backbone structures had a role to play in the intrinsic propensity and the structural preferences in peptides. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | IISER Mohali | en_US |
dc.subject | Conformational Landscape | en_US |
dc.subject | Amino Acids | en_US |
dc.subject | Ab initio Computations | en_US |
dc.title | Restricted backbone preference in the conformational landscape of amino acids: Do they have a role to play in the peptide structure? | en_US |
dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
dc.guide | Viswanathan, K.S. | - |
Appears in Collections: | MP-12 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
MP12008.pdf | 7.74 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.