Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1893Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Johal, R.S. | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2020-11-19T08:57:58Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2020-11-19T08:57:58Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Physical Review E, 96 (1) | en_US |
| dc.identifier.other | 10.1103/PhysRevE.96.012151 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://journals.aps.org/pre/pdf/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.012151 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1893 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | The low-dissipation model and the endoreversible model of heat engines are two of the most commonly studiedmodels of machines in finite-time thermodynamics. In this paper we compare the performance characteristicsof these two models under optimal power output. We point out a basic equivalence between them, in the linearresponse regime | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en_US | en_US |
| dc.publisher | APS | en_US |
| dc.subject | Heat engines | en_US |
| dc.subject | optimal power | en_US |
| dc.subject | Low-dissipation | en_US |
| dc.title | Heat engines at optimal power: Low-dissipation versus endoreversible model | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | Research Articles | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Need to add pdf.odt | 8.63 kB | OpenDocument Text | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.