Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2096
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChatterjee, H.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-24T05:04:58Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-24T05:04:58Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationEconomic and Political Weekly, 53(12), pp. 93-100en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.epw.in/journal/2018/12/review-urban-affairs/partitioned-urbanity.html-1?0=ip_login_no_cache%3D43428db69b000a5b35c9effb3e3f9f52-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/2096-
dc.description.abstractThe partition of British India precipitated a set of instruments of governance that shaped occupations, land-use patterns, and forms of citizenship in urban hinterlands. This process is explored through an ethnographic and archival study of a village in Kolkata's urban periphery, populated by an oppressed caste community called Namasudras, who had suffered repeated displacements. Namasudra refugee labour was crucial in the making of Kolkata's suburban infrastructure, prompted by a process of state-led "deagrarianisation" and inter-community politico-economic competition that also displaced the local Muslim peasantryen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherEconomic and Political Weeklyen_US
dc.subjectUrbanismen_US
dc.subjectrefugee villageen_US
dc.subjectpartition of British Indiaen_US
dc.titlePartitioned urbanity: A refugee village bordering Kolkataen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Research Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Need to add pdf.odt8.63 kBOpenDocument TextView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.