Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4571
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJena, Satyajit-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-12T05:23:08Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-12T05:23:08Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Instrumentation, 17(8), T08013.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/17/08/T08013-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/4571-
dc.descriptionOnly IISER Mohali authors are available in the record.en_US
dc.description.abstractWe compare different neural network architectures for machine learning algorithms designed to identify the neutrino interaction vertex position in the MINERvA detector. The architectures developed and optimized by hand are compared with the architectures developed in an automated way using the package "Multi-node Evolutionary Neural Networks for Deep Learning" (MENNDL), developed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory. While the domain-expert hand-tuned network was the best performer, the differences were negligible and the auto-generated networks performed as well. There is always a trade-off between human, and computer resources for network optimization and this work suggests that automated optimization, assuming resources are available, provides a compelling way to save significant expert time.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherIOP Publishingen_US
dc.subjectVertex findingen_US
dc.subjectneutrino-nucleusen_US
dc.subjectinteractionen_US
dc.titleVertex finding in neutrino-nucleus interactionen_US
dc.title.alternativea model architecture comparison-
dc.typeArticle-
Appears in Collections:Research Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Need To Add…Full Text_PDF.15.36 kBUnknownView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.